Dec 9, 2012
I Still Don't Completely Understand What Happened to the WTC
After all the years I've spent on this, I still don't feel completely comfortable with any of the explanations put out for the WTC destruction:
1) collapse (official story)
2) conventional explosives
4) beam weapons/directed energy weapons
6) hollow-tower theory with explosives
7) nukes in basement
8) combination of high-tech devices
I still think mini-nukes is the best explanation.
But still, it's hard to fathom many small nukes whose blasts were not observed to any significant extent, leading to that degree of disintegration. Part of the problem overall is just we don't really understand how much of the tower was indeed disintegrated, and how the remaining debris was situated at ground zero. For instance, some pictures show an extensive pileup of debris in the basement region-- even floor-like remnants stacked. How many floors were like that? We just don't know. How much of the inside stuff-- doors, walls, furniture, toilets, sinks, people-- was completely wiped away? The pictures we have just do not enlighten me as to the state of the debris-- a lot of it is just random pipes and steel and dirt that just looks like part of a collapse. A simple collapse cannot explain so much missing material.
Nukes would leave a lot of molten type debris-- which there is some evidence for but not as much as you might think would result from nukes that vaporized huge amounts of steel.
There were reports of pools of molten steel in the basement, but no pics. Some reports say the garage under WTC1 was barely affected, with some pics, but still a selective view and no comprehensive idea of what happened.
DEW just doesn't make sense in terms of energy or the selective and random nature of what was disintegrated.
The overall state of the debris -- especially how much was underground-- is still a huge mystery to me.
I think until we have a better view of the debris, we will not really know for sure how the WTC was destroyed.